(Door: “Peter Selie”)
Covid behapbaar? Juich niet te vroeg. Hun ware aard moeten ze nog laten zien. En die zal u heugen.
Ik verbaas mij er nog altijd over dat politici wereldwijd zich hebben laten omkopen door de NWO. Hoe moet je je eigen kiezers haten? Wat hebben ze voor hun verraad toch gekregen? Behoren ze niet tot de x miljard mensen die er volgens Bill Gates teveel op aarde zijn en die volgens de VN via de injectienaald moeten worden geruimd? Met ander woorden: moeten worden afgemaakt. Daar heeft overigens de Kroatische Europarlementariër hen deze week in het Europees Parlement nog eens fijntjes op gewezen. Merci, meneer Mislav Kolakusic. Het is zeer ongebruikelijk, maar wel duidelijk en nodig.
Even voor de Covid-bio-bom kwam “socialist” = ( voor verheffing van de arbeiders) Frans Timmermans ons vertellen dat de blanken moesten worden ‘uitgeroeid’ tot in alle uithoeken van de aarde en vervangen worden door kleurlingen. Geen nieuws voor onze linkse kranten inclusief de krant van wakker Nederland, die, zo las ik dezer dagen, voor 40% in handen is gekomen van de Soros-kliek, die overigens ook al een adviserende stem heeft in de EU. Maak je borst maar nat!
De kracht van Nederland moet worden vernietigd en daar wordt hard aan gewerkt door onze politici zelf. Wie anders durft te beweren, krijgt het zwaar in de kliek volksverraders. Daar weet Forum van mee te praten.
Het zou goed en juist zijn om te onderzoeken wat van origine Nederlands is en was, in wiens handen het in feite nu is. Want de Chinezen zijn erg kooplustig in Europa. Afrika is al grotendeels van de Chinezen. Dat konden we 50 jaar geleden al aan zien komen! Maar politici zien dat natuurlijk niet!
Hoogovens is via het verlieslijdende British Steel in handen van de Indiërs gekomen en KLM is uiteindelijk via een aantal hebzuchtige aandeelhouders, en waarschijnlijk ook nog van een er niet slechter van geworden directeur, in handen gevallen van de Fransen.
Nederland heeft deze week het grootste sluizencomplex ter wereld geopend. Daar heb je niet veel aan als er nog nauwelijks een vissersboot of een lid van de NWO met zijn potsierlijke in Korea gebouwde jacht, van onze armoede, door vaart!
Nu Covid (nog) niet het gewenste resultaat heeft bereikt, daagt men de Russen uit met de gedachte in het achterhoofd dat kernwapens misschien meer succes zullen geven dan de gehoopte vaccins. Denk er aan dat we met Satanisten van doen hebben: harteloos, zielloos, gevoelloos en gewetenloos. Kortom, het zijn psychopaten, die willen ellende zien.
Het doet mij genoegen wat ik de afgelopen dagen vanuit Canada zag en trouwens ook in Oostenrijk en Duitsland mogen de wekelijkse demo’s er zijn. De strafmaatregelen tegen de niet-gevaccineerden schijnen te zijn uitgewerkt, maar ondertussen zijn er wel een aantal wetten doorgevoerd om de burger het leven zuur te maken.
Wij, de Europese volkeren, zijn de belangrijkste financiers van de instituties als VN, met al die door henzelf bedachte tentakels. Ook de EU is een parasiet, die is opgericht om Europa te ontkerstenen en te islamiseren. Het is dus gewoon een strijd van Satan tegen God. Met al hun draconische maatregelen om het volk het leven onmogelijk te maken. Met hooguit nog 5 à 10 jaar zal het EU-monster de kraaienmars blazen.
Wees voorbereid en houd stand en pas goed op uzelf en uw omgeving.
Door:
“Peter Selie”
(voor www.ejbron.wordpress.com)
E.J. Bron 
LikeLike
Doorrijden!!!
LikeLike
Een artikel uit mijn hart.
Niets aan toe te voegen 👍
LikeGeliked door 1 persoon
Er zijn inderdaad rare dingen in een grote stroomversnelling gekomen. Als je puur en alleen materialistisch denkt, zoals bijna alléén in onze streken in Europa nu mode is wordt door de overgrote meerderheid van de wereld niet gedeeld: 84 % van de wereldbevolking is religieus en die zal tegenwoordig ook wel denken: wat is hier aan de hand!
Christenen hebben hun laatste Bijbelboek en zoals iedereen weet is het laatste hoofdstuk van ieder boek de ontknoping en die is in de ‘Openbaring’ alles behalve leuk en schijnt veel wat nu in aanleg te zien te voorspellen: de verderving van steeds meer mensen, de valse profeten (Schwaab en zijn volgers), de antichristen ( want er is wel één grote, maar eerder al in meervoud).
Maar ook de Hindoes hebben precies hetzelfde, in de Bhagavat Gita staat ook dat de wereld steeds meer zal gaan afglijden naar het ‘tijdperk van Kali’, een zwarte godin, waar de wereld tenslotte een woestijn zal worden, volgens hu tijdrekening zitten we al een tijd ín dat tijdperk.
Boeddhisten hebben dit ook. Boeddha spreekt over een verval van het geloof en de mens die zich steeds meer aan uiterlijkheden gaat hechten, monniken die wel de oranje pij dragen maar geen monnik meer zijn en een terugkomst van de ‘Maitreya’ in de ‘eindtijd’.
De west-europese materialisten (en dito leiders en elites in de wereld die nergens meer in geloven, allen geld en macht), zien het alleen in materialistische termen. Van die 84% die wel ergens in gelooft zullen er ook veel gaan denken: hier zijn duistere machten aan het werk. Wat díe daar uiteindelijk mee zullen gaan doen is onduidelijk. De christenen voerden hun kruistochten voor het geloof, de Bhagavat Gita is onderdeel van de Mahabharata, een oorlogsepos waarin een historische strijd staat van goed tegen kwaad….
LikeLike
Niets aan toe te voegen. Puur de waarheid.
LikeGeliked door 1 persoon
Zo denken er meer en niet de minste, o.a. de ex-pauselijke ambassadeur in de USA:
Brief van aartsbisschop Viganò aan president Trump zomer 2020:
https://deblauwetijger.com/brief-van-aartsbisschop-vigano-aan-president-trump-volledig-nederlands
LikeLike
Vanaf gisteren moet iedereen die in het ziekenhuis is opgenomen en die positief test voor corona als coronapatiënt worden opgegeven. Daar horen ook diegenen bij die voor een andere aandoening zijn opgenomen. Zij worden ook getest en je kunt er gif op nemen, dat door de hoge besmettelijkheid van omicron, heel wat positieve tests te verwachten zijn. Je wordt bijvoorbeeld opgenomen voor een blindedarmoperatie, je wordt positief getest, hupsakee, weer een çoronapatiënt erbij. Zo kun je de cijfers lekker opkrikken en kunnen virologen als Koopmans weer schreeuwen om maatregelen en lockdowns. Het volgende bericht is van het ANP dat nu eindelijk eens fatsoenlijk bericht geeft:
https://www.msn.com/nl-nl/gezondheid/medisch/toename-coronapati%C3%ABnten-komt-mogelijk-door-berekening-ziekenhuizen/ar-AATzxaL?ocid=msedgntp
LikeLike
Paulusma in de Slaapkamer
video A: “Ja, dank u mevrouw de voorzitter en ik ben heel blij dat meneer Omtzigt dit benoemt en deze vraag stelt!”
video B: “Ja, dank u mevrouw de voorzitter en ik ben heel blij dat mevrouw Agema dit benoemt en deze vraag stelt!”
Video C: “Ja, dank u mevrouw de voorzitter en ik ben heel blij dat meneer Van Meijeren dit benoemt en deze vraag stelt!”
Kassière: Wilt u de kassabon?
Mevrouw Paulusma: Ik zal mijzelf even herhalen. Vanavond eten wij chinees. En ik begrijp goed dat andere mensen misschien stamppot of sushi eten. Maar de wind waait harder langs de kust zoals mijn man vanochtend ook al terecht aangaf.
Allemachtig, kan dit geschifte element eens bij het vuil gezet worden?
LikeLike
GAAF STUK PETER, BLIJ JE WEER TE ZIEN HIER . DIKKE HUG
HEEL EUROPA WAS INGENOMEN ?? EN VERNIETIGD???
HEEL EUROPA ??
NEE …… EEN KLEIN ???????? MET EEN TAXICHAUFFEUR AAN DE LEIDING LANDJE , VOCHT DAPPER DOOR ..
MISSCHIEN ALS JE DIT LEEST , IS ER NOG HOOP GENOEG
DIKKE HUG
JE VRIEND OME BOBZELF
La humanidad perfecta
·
Putin has banned Rothschild and his family from the NWO banking cartel from entering Russian territory.
Recently, Russian President Vladimir Putin took another decision for his country. “Under any circumstances,” the Rothschild family are banned from entering Russian territory.
Along with his plans for the NWO, Jacob Rothschild’s ban is no surprise.
After paying Russia’s debt to the Rothschilds, Putin didn’t hesitate to inform advisors of his actions: “he grabbed them by the neck and threw them out Russia’s backdoor.”
During the meeting in question, Putin was clearly unhappy with the secret elite’s agenda to take over the country.
It seems his fist bumping the table and promise to destroy the New World Order show clear evidence of Putin’s integrity.
According to a Kremlin source, the Russian president is actually fighting for his country against Rothschild. Vladimir Putin states:
“They don’t own the world and they don’t have a blank card to do what they want. If we don’t challenge them, there will be another problem. We will not be intimidated by them.”
According to sources, the Rothschild’s banking activities damaged the Russian economy. Thus continuing down this path would only lead to more struggles in their population.
From his first days as president, Vladimir Putin made Russia’s social and economic situation his top priority. Your arrest of dictator Mikhail Khodorkovsky was just the beginning.
Also, Khodorkovsky is known for the appointment of Henry Kissinger, Arthur Hartman and even Rothschild as directors of the Russia Open Foundation.
Also, angry at the actions of the owners of the back, Putin kicked them out in seconds. Being a history student with a great passion for world affairs, Putin was able to understand these organizations and their schemes.
For the Russian president, the primary goal was to avoid conflicts between members such as the Rothschilds.
Are the Rothschilds trying to start a new world war? Should we prepare for WW3?
Despite Putin’s attempts to end them, the New World Order continues to expand, not just in Russia but around the world. Thanks to Vladimir Putin, Russia is now safe.
World domination is no longer an issue. The ban on the Rothschild plans given by Putin ended his influence and expansion over Russia.
Even if they are one of the biggest threats right now, the Rothschild is now running scared of the president. Unlike the image associated with it, on the other hand, the media doesn’t highlight Putin’s power to fight for what is right.
Truth be told, Putin is creating a better world. He is trying to go against the NWO plan to unify and create a government run world.
A clear example of this is his actions in Syria. In that situation, he defended the sovereignty of a state, and that also grew his reputation as a powerful leader.
People are starting to realize. More than that, NWO needs to be dealt with, come what may. Knowing all this, will the world just sit back and wait for people like the Rothschild’s to take over the world?
DIKKE HUG MAKKER VLADIBOB
LikeGeliked door 2 people
LikeLike
WAT LEUK !!
DUS AL DIE GOUWE OUWE SPREUKEN …WERKEN NOG STEEDS .
WIE WIND ZAAIT ZAL STORM OOGSTEN …
DUS KOMT DE USA NU IN EEN POSITIE .DIE ZE VOOR MIJN OOM HADDEN BEDACHT .
WHAHAHAHAHA
👉 US Reaping What It Sowed in 🇺🇦 Ukraine
So, what are Americans to believe about the rising tensions over Ukraine? The United States and Russia both claim their escalations are defensive, responding to threats and escalations by the other side, but the resulting spiral of escalation can only make war more likely. Ukrainian President Zelensky is warning that “panic” by U.S. and Western leaders is already causing economic destabilization in Ukraine.
U.S. allies do not all support the current U.S. policy.
Germany is wisely refusing to funnel more weapons into Ukraine, in keeping with its long-standing policy of not sending weapons into conflict zones.
Ralf Stegner, a senior member of parliament for Germany’s ruling Social Democrats, told the BBC on Jan. 25 that the Minsk-Normandy process agreed to by France, Germany, Russia and Ukraine in 2015 is still the right framework for ending the civil war.
“The Minsk Agreement hasn’t been applied by both sides,” Stegner explained, “and it just doesn’t make any sense to think that forcing up the military possibilities would make it better. Rather, I think it’s the hour of diplomacy.”
By contrast,
most American politicians and corporate media have fallen in line with a one-sided narrative that paints Russia as the aggressor in Ukraine and support sending more and more weapons to Ukrainian government forces.
After decades of U.S. military disasters based on such one-sided narratives, Americans should know better by now.
But what is it that our leaders and the corporate media are not telling us this time?
The most critical events that have been airbrushed out of the West’s political narrative are the violation of agreements Western leaders made at the end of the Cold War not to expand NATO into Eastern Europe, and the U.S.-backed coup in Ukraine in February 2014.
Western mainstream media accounts date the crisis in Ukraine back to Russia’s 2014 reintegration of Crimea, and the decision by ethnic Russians in eastern Ukraine to secede from Ukraine as the Luhansk and Donetsk People’s Republics.
US-Backed Coup
But these were not unprovoked actions. They were responses to the U.S.-backed coup, in which an armed mob led by the neo-Nazi Right Sector militia stormed the Ukrainian parliament, forcing the elected President Viktor Yanukovich and members of his party to flee for their lives. After the events of Jan. 6, 2021, in Washington, that should now be easier for Americans to understand.
The remaining members of parliament voted to form a new government, subverting the political transition and plans for a new election that Yanukovich had publicly agreed to the day before, after meetings with the foreign ministers of France, Germany and Poland.
The U.S. role in managing the coup was exposed by a leaked 2014 audio recording of Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland and U.S. Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt working on their plans, which included sidelining the European Union (“Fuck the EU,” as Nuland put it) and shoehorning in U.S. protege Arseniy Yatsenyuk (“Yats”) as prime minister.
At the end of the call, Ambassador Pyatt told Nuland, “…we want to try to get somebody with an international personality to come out here and help to midwife this thing.”
Nuland replied (verbatim),
“So on that piece Geoff, when I wrote the note, [Biden’s National Security Advisor Jake] Sullivan’s come back to me VFR [very quickly?], saying you need [Vice President] Biden and I said probably tomorrow for an atta-boy and to get the deets [details?] to stick. So Biden’s willing.”
It has never been explained why two senior State Department officials who were plotting a regime change in Ukraine looked to Vice President Joe Biden to “midwife this thing,” instead of to their own boss, Secretary of State John Kerry.
Now that the crisis over Ukraine has blown up with a vengeance during Biden’s first year as president, such unanswered questions about his role in the 2014 coup have become more urgent and troubling. And why did President Biden appoint Nuland to the No. 4 position at the State Department, despite (or was it because of?) her critical role in triggering the disintegration of Ukraine and an eight-year-long civil war that has so far killed at least 14,000 people?
Post-Coup Government
Both of Nuland’s hand-picked puppets in Ukraine, Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk and President Petro Poroshenko, were soon mired in corruption scandals. Yatsenyuk was forced to resign after two years and Poroshenko was outed in a tax evasion scandal revealed in the Panama Papers. Post-coup, war-torn Ukraine remains the poorest country in Europe and one of the most corrupt.
The Ukrainian military had little enthusiasm for a civil war against its own people in eastern Ukraine, so the post-coup government formed new “National Guard” units to assault the separatist People’s Republics. The infamous Azov Battalion drew its first recruits from the Right Sector militia and openly displays neo-Nazi symbols, yet it has kept receiving U.S. arms and training, even after Congress explicitly cut off its U.S. funding in the FY2018 Defense Appropriation bill.
In 2015, the Minsk and Normandy negotiations led to a ceasefire and the withdrawal of heavy weapons from a buffer zone around the separatist-held areas. Ukraine agreed to grant greater autonomy to Donetsk, Luhansk and other ethnically Russian areas of Ukraine, but it has failed to follow through on that.
A federal system, with some powers devolved to individual provinces or regions, could help to resolve the all-or-nothing power struggle between Ukrainian nationalists and Ukraine’s traditional ties to Russia that has dogged its politics since independence in 1991.
But the U.S. and NATO’s interest in Ukraine is not really about resolving its regional differences, but about something else altogether. The U.S. coup was calculated to put Russia in an impossible position. If Russia did nothing, post-coup Ukraine would sooner or later join NATO, as NATO members already agreed to in principle in 2008. NATO forces would advance right up to Russia’s border and Russia’s important naval base at Sevastopol in the Crimea would fall under NATO control.
On the other hand, if Russia had responded to the coup by invading Ukraine, there would have been no turning back from a disastrous new Cold War with the West. To Washington’s frustration, Russia found a middle path out of this dilemma, by accepting the result of Crimea’s referendum to rejoin Russia, but only giving covert support to the separatists in the East.
In 2021, with Nuland once again installed in a corner office at the State Department, the Biden administration quickly cooked up a plan to put Russia in a new pickle. The United States had already given Ukraine $2 billion in military aid since 2014, and Biden has added another $650 million to that, along with deployments of U.S. and NATO military trainers.
Minsk-Normandy Process Abandoned
Ukraine has still not implemented the constitutional changes called for in the Minsk agreements, and the unconditional military support the United States and NATO have provided has encouraged Ukraine’s leaders to effectively abandon the Minsk-Normandy process and simply reassert sovereignty over all of Ukraine’s territory, including Crimea.
In practice, Ukraine could only recover those territories by a major escalation of the civil war, and that was exactly what Ukraine and its NATO backers appeared to be preparing for in March 2021. But that prompted Russia to begin moving troops and conducting military exercises, within its own territory (including Crimea), but close enough to Ukraine to deter a new offensive by Ukrainian government forces.
In October, Ukraine launched new attacks in Donbass. Russia, which still had about 100,000 troops stationed near Ukraine, responded with new troop movements and military exercises. U.S. officials launched an information warfare campaign to frame Russia’s troop movements as an unprovoked threat to invade Ukraine, concealing their own role in fueling the threatened Ukrainian escalation that Russia is responding to. U.S. propaganda has gone so far as to preemptively dismiss any actual new Ukrainian assault in the East as a Russian false-flag operation.
Underlying all these tensions is NATO’s expansion through Eastern Europe to the borders of Russia, in violation of commitments Western officials made at the end of the Cold War. The U.S. and NATO’s refusal to acknowledge that they have violated those commitments or to negotiate a diplomatic resolution with the Russians is a central factor in the breakdown of U.S.-Russian relations.
While U.S. officials and corporate media are scaring the pants off Americans and Europeans with tales of an impending Russian invasion of Ukraine, Russian officials are warning that U.S.-Russian relations are close to the breaking point. If the United States and NATO are not prepared to negotiate new disarmament treaties, remove U.S. missiles from countries bordering Russia and dial back NATO expansion, Russian officials say they will have no option but to respond with “appropriate military-technical reciprocal measures.”
This expression may not refer to an invasion of Ukraine, as most Western commentators have assumed, but to a broader strategy that could include actions that hit much closer to home for Western leaders.
For example, Russia could place short-range nuclear missiles in Kaliningrad (between Lithuania and Poland), within range of European capitals; it could establish military bases in Iran, Cuba, Venezuela and other friendly countries; and it could deploy submarines armed with hypersonic nuclear missiles to the Western Atlantic, from where they could destroy Washington, D.C., in a matter of minutes.
It has long been a common refrain among American activists to point to the 800 or so U.S. military bases all over the world and ask, “How would Americans like it if Russia or China built military bases in Mexico or Cuba?” Well, we may be about to find out.
Hypersonic nuclear missiles off the U.S. East Coast would put the United States in a similar position to that in which NATO has placed the Russians. China could adopt a similar strategy in the Pacific to respond to U.S. military bases and deployments around its coast.
So the revived Cold War that U.S. officials and corporate media hacks have been mindlessly cheering on could very quickly turn into one in which the United States would find itself just as encircled and endangered as its enemies.
Will the prospect of such a 21st century Cuban Missile Crisis be enough to bring America’s irresponsible leaders to their senses and back to the negotiating table, to start unwinding the suicidal mess they have blundered into? We certainly hope so.
Medea Benjamin is the co-founder of CODEPINK: Women for Peace and the author of numerous books including Kingdom of the Unjust: Behind the US-Saudi Connection and Inside Iran: the Real History and Politics of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
LEUK HE MENSEN MET HERSENS ,DIE VERTELLEN WAT OME BOB U PAS SINDS 2014 VERTELD HEEFT …..
DE WAARHEID EN NIETS DAN DE WAARHEID
OOM VLADIBOB
LikeLike
Ik weet het niet Peter Selie.
Alles bij elkaar genomen heb Ik toch meer het idee dat veel regeringen zich te veel hebben laten gijzelen door de farmaindustrie en de WHO.
Als je de contracten gezien hebt die naar buiten gekomen zijn welke Pfizer heeft opgesteld en dat de onderzoeken van Big Farma gewoon klakkeloos worden overgenomen om beleid te maken is het duidelijk dat veel landen politiek en financieel in handen zijn gekomen van grote investeerders die samenwerken als criminele organisatie.
LikeLike
Fascist wil 29,6 miljoen extra uit de belastingpot laten graaien voor het in stand houden van de walgelijke discriminerende corona apps. https://www.ninefornews.nl/kuipers-wil-29-miljoen-euro-extra-voor-corona-apps-dat-is-belachelijk-veel-geld/ De fascist D66 Kuipers kan wat mij morgen nog worden opgepakt. Het is een smerige leugenaar en paniekzaaier die puur handel in opdracht van het WEF en de apps in stand dient te houden voor het realiseren van het sociaal kredietsysteem. Valt bij miljoenen mensen nu nog het muntje niet dat het absoluut niet gaan om de volksgezondheid en blijven miljoenen mensen zich overleveren aan de fascist Kuipers door continu prikjes de komende jaren te blijven halen. Kuipers schaft helemaal niets af en de corona apps zijn niet voor korte duur. Als we niet meer vaccinatie terreur willen moeten we nu massaal die QR code de prullenbak in flikkeren en in geen enkel geval nog een toegangscode tonen. Aanpakken die machtswellusteling anders gaat hij elke dag stap voor stap verder totdat hij zijn doel heeft bereikt zoals hem door het WEF is opgedragen. Ondertussen hebben 500.000 mensen die zoetje hun prikjes hebben gehaald hun groene vinkje kwijt mits ze uiteraard een booster halen. Wat mij betreft mag de vaccinatieterrorist morgen nog een enkeltje naar hogere sferen krijgen.
LikeLike
JE HOEFT JE OOK LATER NIET AF TE VRAGEN
WAT MIJN OOM VLADIMIR BEDOELDE TOEN HIJ DIT ZEI . WHAHAHAHAHA
LOUJD EN CLEAR
7 Feb, 2022 22:40
Russia & France could go to war, Putin warns Macron
That’s what would happen if Ukraine joins NATO, !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DIT RIEP IK 12 MAANDEN GELEDEN AL
NAVO IN UKRAINE DAN LOOPT PUTIN DUS NAAR BINNEN DUS DUIDELIJK ??
the Russian president has said
Russia & France could go to war, Putin warns Macron
Russian President Vladimir Putin during a joint press conference with French President Emmanuel Macron, February 7, 2022 in Moscow.
Russian President Vladimir Putin told reporters on Monday that Ukraine’s entry into the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and a follow-up attempt to retake Crimea would potentially cause a war between Russia and France, as he spoke at a press conference alongside French President Emmanuel Macron.
Putin explained in no uncertain terms what Ukraine being accepted into NATO could lead to as he responded to a question by a French journalist.
“You want France to fight Russia? That’s exactly what would happen” if Ukraine joins NATO and tries to implement its state policy of ‘reintegrating’ Crimea by force, Putin told reporters.
Kiev has designated Russia as an adversary and insists Crimea belongs to Ukraine, the Russian president explained. After the 2014 coup in Kiev, the peninsula voted to rejoin Russia, something most NATO countries have not recognized.
You ask me if Russia wants to fight a war with NATO – let me ask you, does NATO want to fight a war with Russia?
An attack by Ukraine on Crimea would trigger Article 5 of NATO’s founding treaty, pulling all of Europe into a war with Russia, Putin explained.
“Russia is one of the world’s leading atomic powers. There would be no victors,” Putin told reporters. “[Macron] does not desire such an outcome. Neither do I.”
Putin and Macron reveal outcome of key Ukraine talks READ MORE: Putin and Macron reveal outcome of key Ukraine talks
The Russian president pointed out that Kiev has already used force to resolve the crisis in Donbass – the two eastern regions of Donetsk and Lugansk – twice already.
“Where are our guarantees that they won’t try again?” he asked.
Macron visited Moscow on Monday to discuss the situation in Ukraine, broader questions of European security, as well as bilateral relations with Russia. He is due in Kiev on Tuesday, for talks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
U ZIET DAT PUYIN HET NU GEWOON OVERNEEMT
HEERLIJK HEERLIJK . EN WIJ HEBBEN RUTTE GAAF TOCH WHAHAHAHA
OOM BOBZELLUF
LikeLike
IK HOOP DAT IK HET U EEN BEETJE DUIDELIJK KAN MAKEN ..
LEES DIT EERST , WAT ER GEBEURD ALS THE USA / NAVO RUSSIA AANVALT ??? …
IS DIT DAN DUIDELIJK ???
This is what will happen if the US and NATO seek to attach the “sacred obligation” of Article 5 of the NATO Charter to Ukraine. It is, in short, a suicide pact.
HIER IS DE UITLEG ,VOOR MENSEN DIE HET ECHJT WILLEN WETEN !!
Putin continued, “Let us imagine that Ukraine is a NATO member and is stuffed with weapons and there are state-of-the-art missile systems just like in Poland and Romania. Who will stop it from unleashing operations in Crimea, let alone Donbass? Let us imagine that Ukraine is a NATO member and ventures such a combat operation. Do we have to fight with the NATO bloc? Has anyone thought anything about it? It seems not.”
But these words were dismissed by White House spokesperson Jen Psaki, who likened them to a fox “screaming from the top of the hen house that he’s scared of the chickens,” adding that any Russian expression of fear over Ukraine “should not be reported as a statement of fact.”
Ukraine’s Zelensky approves strategy for ‘return’ of Crimea from ‘military adversary’ Russia & names NATO membership as key goal
Read more
Ukraine’s Zelensky approves strategy for ‘return’ of Crimea from ‘military adversary’ Russia & names NATO membership as key goal
Psaki’s comments, however, are divorced from the reality of the situation. The principal goal of the government of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is what he terms the “de-occupation” of Crimea. While this goal has, in the past, been couched in terms of diplomacy – “[t]he synergy of our efforts must force Russia to negotiate the return of our peninsula,” Zelensky told the Crimea Platform, a Ukrainian forum focused on regaining control over Crimea – the reality is his strategy for return is a purely military one, in which Russia has been identified as a “military adversary”, and the accomplishment of which can only be achieved through NATO membership.
How Zelensky plans on accomplishing this goal using military means has not been spelled out. As an ostensibly defensive alliance, the odds are that NATO would not initiate any offensive military action to forcibly seize the Crimean Peninsula from Russia. Indeed, the terms of Ukraine’s membership, if granted, would need to include some language regarding the limits of NATO’s Article 5 – which relates to collective defense – when addressing the Crimea situation, or else a state of war would de facto exist upon Ukrainian accession.
The most likely scenario would involve Ukraine being rapidly brought under the ‘umbrella’ of NATO protection, with ‘battlegroups’ like those deployed into eastern Europe being formed on Ukrainian soil as a ‘trip-wire’ force, and modern air defenses combined with forward-deployed NATO aircraft put in place to secure Ukrainian airspace.
Once this umbrella has been established, Ukraine would feel emboldened to begin a hybrid conflict against what it terms the Russian occupation of Crimea, employing unconventional warfare capability it has acquired since 2015 at the hands of the CIA to initiate an insurgency designed specifically to “kill Russians.”
The idea that Russia would sit idly by while a guerilla war in Crimea was being implemented from Ukraine is ludicrous; if confronted with such a scenario, Russia would more than likely use its own unconventional capabilities in retaliation. Ukraine, of course, would cry foul, and NATO would be confronted with its mandatory obligation for collective defense under Article 5. In short, NATO would be at war with Russia.
This is not idle speculation. When explaining his recent decision to deploy some 3,000 US troops to Europe in response to the ongoing Ukrainian crisis, US President Joe Biden declared, “As long as he’s [Putin] acting aggressively, we are going to make sure we reassure our NATO allies in Eastern Europe that we’re there and Article 5 is a sacred obligation.”
Biden’s comments echo those made during his initial visit to NATO Headquarters, on June 15 last year. At that time, Biden sat down with NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg and emphasized America’s commitment to Article 5 of the NATO charter. “Article 5 we take as a sacred obligation,” Biden said. “I want NATO to know America is there.”
Biden’s view of NATO and Ukraine is drawn from his experience as vice president under Barack Obama. In 2015, then-Deputy Secretary of Defense Bob Work told reporters, “As President Obama has said, Ukraine should … be able to choose its own future. And we reject any talk of a sphere of influence. And speaking in Estonia this past September, the president made it clear that our commitment to our NATO allies in the face of Russian aggression is unwavering. As he said it, in this alliance there are no old members and there are no new members. There are no junior partners and there are no senior partners. There are just allies, pure and simple. And we will defend the territorial integrity of every single ally.”
Just what would this defense entail? As someone who once trained to fight the Soviet Army, I can attest that a war with Russia would be unlike anything the US military has experienced – ever. The US military is neither organized, trained, nor equipped to fight its Russian counterparts. Nor does it possess doctrine capable of supporting large-scale combined arms conflict. If the US was to be drawn into a conventional ground war with Russia,
it would find itself facing defeat on a scale unprecedented in American military history. In short, it would be a rout.
Don’t take my word for it. In 2016, then-Lieutenant General H.R. McMaster, when speaking about the results of a study – the Russia New Generation Warfare – he had initiated in 2015 to examine lessons learned from the fighting in eastern Ukraine, told an audience at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington
hat the Russians have superior artillery firepower,
better combat vehicles,
and have learned sophisticated use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for tactical effect.
Should US forces find themselves in a land war with Russia,”
McMaster said, “they would be in for a rude, cold awakening.”
In short, they would get their asses kicked.
America’s 20-year Middle Eastern misadventure in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria
produced a military that was no longer capable of defeating
a peer-level opponent on the battlefield.
This reality was highlighted in a study conducted by the US Army’s 173rd Airborne Brigade, the central American component of NATO’s Rapid Deployment Force, in 2017.
The study found that US military forces in Europe were underequipped,
undermanned,
and inadequately organized to confront military aggression from Russia.
The lack of viable air defense and electronic warfare capability, when combined with an over-reliance on satellite communications and GPS navigation systems,
would result in the piecemeal destruction of the US Army in rapid order should they face off against a Russian military that was organized, trained, and equipped to specifically defeat a US/NATO threat.
The issue isn’t just qualitative, but also quantitative – even if the US military could stand toe-to-toe with a Russian adversary (which it can’t), it simply lacks the size to survive in any sustained battle or campaign. The low-intensity conflict that the US military waged in Iraq and Afghanistan has created an organizational ethos built around the idea that every American life is precious, and that all efforts will be made to evacuate the wounded so that they can receive life-saving medical attention in as short a timeframe as possible. This concept may have been viable where the US was in control of the environment in which fights were conducted. It is, however, pure fiction in large-scale combined arms warfare. There won’t be medical evacuation helicopters flying to the rescue – even if they launched, they would be shot down. There won’t be field ambulances – even if they arrived on the scene, they would be destroyed in short order. There won’t be field hospitals – even if they were established, they would be captured by Russian mobile forces.
What there will be is death and destruction, and lots of it. One of the events which triggered McMaster’s study of Russian warfare was the destruction of a Ukrainian combined arms brigade by Russian artillery in early 2015. This, of course, would be the fate of any similar US combat formation. The superiority Russia enjoys in artillery fires is overwhelming, both in terms of the numbers of artillery systems fielded and the lethality of the munitions employed.
While the US Air Force may be able to mount a fight in the airspace above any battlefield, there will be nothing like the total air supremacy enjoyed by the American military in its operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. The airspace will be contested by a very capable Russian air force, and Russian ground troops will be operating under an air defense umbrella the likes of which neither the US nor NATO has ever faced. There will be no close air support cavalry coming to the rescue of beleaguered American troops. The forces on the ground will be on their own.
This feeling of isolation will be furthered by the reality that, because of Russia’s overwhelming superiority in electronic warfare capability, the US forces on the ground will be deaf, dumb, and blind to what is happening around them, unable to communicate, receive intelligence, and even operate as radios, electronic systems, and weapons cease to function.
Any war with Russia would find American forces slaughtered in large numbers. Back in the 1980s, we routinely trained to accept losses of 30-40 percent and continue the fight, because that was the reality of modern combat against a Soviet threat. Back then, we were able to effectively match the Soviets in terms of force size, structure, and capability – in short, we could give as good, or better, than we got.
That wouldn’t be the case in any European war against Russia. The US will lose most of its forces before they are able to close with any Russian adversary, due to deep artillery fires. Even when they close with the enemy, the advantage the US enjoyed against Iraqi and Taliban insurgents and ISIS terrorists is a thing of the past. Our tactics are no longer up to par – when there is close combat, it will be extraordinarily violent, and the US will, more times than not, come out on the losing side.
But even if the US manages to win the odd tactical engagement against peer-level infantry, it simply has no counter to the overwhelming number of tanks and armored fighting vehicles Russia will bring to bear. Even if the anti-tank weapons in the possession of US ground troops were effective against modern Russian tanks (and experience suggests they are probably not), American troops will simply be overwhelmed by the mass of combat strength the Russians will confront them with.
Failure of American ‘disinformation’ revealed
Read more
Failure of American ‘disinformation’ revealed
In the 1980s, I had the opportunity to participate in a Soviet-style attack carried out by specially trained US Army troops – the ‘OPFOR’ – at the National Training Center in Fort Irwin, California, where two Soviet-style Mechanized Infantry Regiments squared off against a US Army Mechanized Brigade. The fight began at around two in the morning. By 5:30am it was over, with the US Brigade destroyed, and the Soviets having seized their objectives. There’s something about 170 armored vehicles bearing down on your position that makes defeat all but inevitable.
This is what a war with Russia would look like. It would not be limited to Ukraine, but extend to battlefields in the Baltic states, Poland, Romania, and elsewhere. It would involve Russian strikes against NATO airfields, depots, and ports throughout the depth of Europe.
This is what will happen if the US and NATO seek to attach the “sacred obligation” of Article 5 of the NATO Charter to Ukraine. It is, in short, a suicide pact.
U HEEFT UW GROOTSTE VRIEND IN DE STEEK GELATEN
NU MA U MEEDOEN MET HET TREKKENAAN EEN DOOD PAARD
MAG IK U EVEN FELICITEREN ??
DANK U , GROTE KLASSE
MIJN OOM . HEERLIJK
LikeLike
t.a.v: Defensie,Justitie,AIVD,Het NCTV,Politie,Leger,en andere moedige overheidsinstanties!!!
Als Christen is het belangrijk de werken der duisternis te ontmaskeren!! Het criminele COVID-19 stappenplan is aantoonbaar een georganiseerde satanische actie om de wereld te destabiliseren!!
We zien hier in Nederland een slapende tweede kamer ,die zelfs niet de waarheid wil horen van de moedige helden van FvD !! De waarheid wordt zelfs aantoonbaar gecensureerd!!De georganiseerde geïnstitutionaliseerde Pharma maffia zijn als de dood dat hun satanische narratief in duigen valt !! De experimentele COVID-19 inentingen zijn stuk voor stuk misdaden tegen de MENSELIJKHEID!! Natuurlijk houden allerlei gecorrumpeerde overheden elkaar ten onrechte de hand boven het hoofd!!Ons kent ons moddert nog een beetje door ,maar al is de leugen nog zo snel DE WAARHEID achterhaalt haar wel!! Ook de waardeloze PCR testen zijn een onwettige methode om angstvallig de plandemie in stand te houden!!De Corona toegangsbewijzen zijn er niet om de gezondheid van de Nederlanders te waarborgen,maar zijn een soort illegale undercover actie van satan en z’n zeer vele fascistische aanhangers zoals o.a; van de totalitaire,inhumane,mensonterende ,fascistische,satanische antichristelijike politieke partij D66,met zelfs een terroristenvereerster Sigrid K. aan het hoofd !
Stop de vaccinazi’s!! Stop het Corona apartheidsregime van de schaamteloze nietsontziende recidiverende psychopaat Mark R., en z’n zeer vele medeplichtige trawanten!!
Stop de medische Corona chantage!! Stop de satanische QR code krankzinnigheid!!!
Bevrijd Nederland van de geïnstitutionaliseerde geïnfiltreerde Big Pharma + Big TEC Maffia !!
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vX2xJOw-sno&feature=youtu.be
Gelukkig zijn er ook nog wel enkele integere betrouwbare wetenschappers,die niet zoals het criminele kabinet van de recidiverende psychopaat Mark de waarheid proberen te verdoezelen!!!
Doodslag door schuld??!!
Een oorlog win je niet door op je lauweren te rusten,weest moedig,en kom uit uw ivoren torens van angst!!!
Sluit mensen als Ernst K., Mark R.,Hugo de J.,en zeer veel andere geïnstitutionaliseerde Pharma criminelen preventief op in de gevangenis!! Voorkomen is beter dan genezen!!!
Shalom van Léon van Duren (een roepende in de woestijn van Nederland)
Haelen 6081CZ
LikeLike
DUS GEWOON EVEN EEN SIMPELE VRAAG , VAN VLADIMIR
OVER DE NAVO ,
EN DIT HEET HUMOR TOCH ??
https://youtu.be/efuH34kP0Lk
LikeGeliked door 1 persoon
BEN NOU TOCH LEKKER BEZIG !!!
ALS VLADIMIR PUTIN DIT UITLEGT ,DAN SNAPT TOCH OOK IEDERE KLOOTVIOOL HET ??
OF WAREN ER NOG MEER VRAGEN ?? VANTIJL OF KLAAS , OF JAN STALIN
WHAHAHA
HODUIDELIJK KAN JE HET UITLEGGEN , MAAR >> PUTIN DID IT
https://youtu.be/W2Cugn8JZfk
WAT EEM KANJER HE. ZO ONBEVREESD. EN HIER HEB JE HEB . NIKS VAN EEN BLAADJE
HE KLAAS ??
LikeGeliked door 1 persoon
LikeLike
Wat een onbenullige reactie , Klaas !
LikeGeliked door 1 persoon
Je ziet maar één kant van het verhaal , VOORTDUREND , Klaas .
Denk je nou echt dat klootzakken zoals Biden verkozen zouden zijn vanwege zijn capaciteiten ?
Wat heeft hij ooit bereikt ?
Dat soort mensen komt nooit op een positie omdat ze geweldig of zo geniaal zijn , slechts door corruptie , leugens , chantage en bedrog . Ook al duurt dat tientallen jaren .
Óf ze worden daar gedropt door het WEF , dankzij verkiezingsfraude etc .
Denk je nou echt dat Biden er wakker van ligt als hier een oorlog uitbreekt ?
Integendeel , het levert enorme winsten op voor de wapenindustrie en je bent stapelgek als je dat niet ziet !
Doet Amerika ooit wat anders ?
LikeLike